Preview

Review of Business and Economics Studies

Advanced search

MICROFINANCE: LEVERAGE OR QUAGMIRE?

Abstract

Whether microfinance is all that its proponents claim? Promoters have hailed microfinance as the silver bullet of development. Advocates say that providing small amounts of credit to the world’s poor can break their cycle of poverty. However, the mixed results of a wide array of impactassessments leave skeptics wondering whether microfinance really does alleviate poverty beyondanecdotal instances. Some experts have suggested that no more than five percent of microfinance institutions (MFIs) worldwide will ever be sustainable. Maybe, the reality is that microfinance may beguilty of over-promising and under-delivering, but it is still an effective development tool. A numberof studies have reached what is now perhaps an obvious conclusion: programs that focus on poverty alleviation rather than those that focus on financial results are more effective at reaching the verypoor. The world is still full of poor people, and the problem of underdevelopment remains one of the intractable challenges of the global economy. For the time being we only put questions. In the nextissues of journal we will try to find answers on these questions.

About the Author

Z. Mierzwa
Financial University
Russian Federation


References

1. ANNUAL REPORT 2014. Grameen Bank.

2. Calderone, Margherita. (2014). The Role of Financial Literacy and of Financial Education Interventions in Developing Countries. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. Roundup Paper, No. 34.

3. Christen, Robert Peck; Rosenberg, Richard; Jayadeva, Veena. (2004). Financial institutions with a doublebottom line: implications for the future of microfi nance. CGAP Occasional Paper.

4. Experiences of microfi nance institutions serving very small to small enterprises in Latin America. International Finance Corporation in Partnership with Dutch Government, 2014.

5. Feigenberg, Benjamin; Field, Erica M.; Pande, Rohini. (2010). Building Social Capital Through MicroFinance». National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 16 018.

6. Global Microscope 2015. The enabling environment for fi nancial inclusion. The Economist Intelligence Unit.

7. Henry, Carla; Sharma, Manohar; Lapenu, Cecile; Zeller, Manfred. (2003). Microfi nance Poverty Assessment Tool. Consultative Group to Assist the Poor. Technical Tools Series, No. 5.

8. Hermes, Niels. (2014). Does microfi nance affect income inequality? Applied Economics, No. 46 (9), 1021-1034. Also: Yunus, Muhammad & Jolis, Alan (contributor). (2008). Banker to the Poor: Micro-Lending and the Battle Against World Poverty. Public Affairs.

9. ILO. (2014). Microfi nance for Decent Work. Enhancing the impact of microfi nance: Evidence from an action research programme. Social Finance Programme & Mannheim University.

10. “Local roots”. Interview with Hans Dieter Seibel. D+C/E+Z, 2010 at: http://www.dandc.eu/en/article/whymicrocredit-programmes-should-be-based-local-savings

11. McMillan, Margaret S. and Rodrik, Dani. (2011). Globalization, Structural Change, and Economic Growth. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 17143. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

12. Robinson, Marguerite. (2001).The Microfi nance Revolution: Sustainable Finance for the Poor (Lessons from Indonesia. The Emerging Industry). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Communications Development Incorporated, Washington, D. C. and San Francisco, California.

13. Rodrik, Dani. (2013). Unconditional Convergence in Manufacturing. Quarterly Journal of Economics.

14. Rodrik, Dani. (2015). Premature De-industrialization. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 20935.

15. Rodrik, Dani. (2015). Work and Human Development in a Deindustrializing World. UNDP Human Development Report Offi ce.

16. Rodrik, Dani. (2016). Is Liberal Democracy Feasible in Developing Countries? Springer Science+Business Media, New York. (Paper was prepared for the 50th Fiftieth Anniversary Conference of Studies in Comparative International Development, Brown University, 2015 October, No. 30).

17. Rutherford, Stuart; Arora, Sukhwinder. (2009). The poor and their money: micro fi nance from a twenty-first century consumer’s perspective. Second edition. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing.


Review

For citations:


Mierzwa Z. MICROFINANCE: LEVERAGE OR QUAGMIRE? Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2016;4(2):15-52. (In Russ.)



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-944X (Print)
ISSN 2311-0279 (Online)