National Policy of Black Sea Region Countries Towards Sustainable Development
https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2022-10-4-6-23
Abstract
The authors consider the integration of the concept of sustainability in the member countries of the Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC). The concept of sustainable development is viewed through the prism of economic, social and environmental approaches.
The subject of the study is the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the BSEC countries.
The purpose of the research is to study the integration of the goals and indicators of sustainable development in the national policies of the BSEC
countries.
The relevance lies in the international community’s growing attention to forming a vector for balanced socio-economic development, taking into account current social, demographic and environmental factors.
The scientific novelty lies in the analysis of the advancement of the concept of sustainable development in the BSEC countries, as well as the level of integration of the SDGs in the national policies of states.
As part of the study, the authors used the methods of institutional analysis, system analysis, analysis of statistical data and official documents. Based on the results of the analysis, it was revealed that despite the high level of integration of the SDGs within the framework of the BSEC, not all goals and indicators of sustainable development formed by the United Nations (UN) are tracked in countries. The authors concluded that the national characteristics of the economy, the social sphere and the environmental situation push states to adapt individual indicators to national specifics.
About the Authors
P. V. StroevRussian Federation
Pavel V. Stroev, Cand. Sci. (Econ.)
Institute of Regional Economics and Interbudgetary Relations
Moscow
A. I. Dudnik
Russian Federation
Anna I. Dudnik, Cand. Sci. (Econ.)
Institute of Regional Economics and Interbudgetary Relations
Moscow
E. S. Konishchev
Russian Federation
Evgeniy S. Konishchev, Junior Scientific Fellow
Institute of Regional Economics and Interbudgetary Relations
Moscow
References
1. Meyer J., Mader M., Zimmermann F. and Çabiri K. Training sessions fostering transdisciplinary collaboration for sustainable development: Albania and Kosovo case studies. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2017; 18 (5): 738–757.
2. Aghajanyan S., Aghajanyan G. Challenges of Green Economy in Armenia. In CSR and Socially Responsible Investing Strategies in Transitioning and Emerging Economies. IGI Global; 2020.
3. Khalilov T., Javadov R., Samadov B. Sustainable Development as an Objective Necessity for the Development of the Non-Oil Sector of Azerbaijan. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings. 2020: 482–486.
4. Ionescu G. H. et al. Assessment of sustainable development goals (SDG) implementation in Bulgaria and future developments. Sustainability. 2021; 13 (21): 12000.
5. Ivanov I. An approach for survey of the sustainable development at regional level: Case of Bulgaria. International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization. 2019; 25 (1): 249–254.
6. Kharazishvili Y., Grishnova O., Kamińska B. Standards of living in Ukraine, Georgia, and Poland: identification and strategic planning. Virtual Economics. 2019;2(2):7–36.
7. Guijarro F., Poyatos J. A. Designing a sustainable development goal index through a goal programming model: The Case of EU-28 Countries. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (9): 3167.
8. Resniova E., Ponomarenko T. Sustainable development of the energy sector in a country deficient in mineral resources: the case of the Republic of Moldova. Sustainability. 2021; 13 (6): 3261.
9. Nagy J. A., Benedek J., Ivan K. Measuring sustainable development goals at a local level: A case of a metropolitan area in Romania. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (11): 3962.
10. Tulupov A. S., Mudretsov A. F., Prokopiev M. G. Sustainable green development of Russia. In Complex Systems: Innovation and Sustainability in the Digital Age. Springer, Cham, 2020: 135–140.
11. Mayorova E. I., Temnova E. V. Concept of sustainable development: regulatory aspect. Upravlenie. 2020; 8 (4): 94–100.
12. Ilic B. S. Social component of sustainable development and quality of life: region of the Balkans, eastern Serbia. In Handbook of research on creating sustainable value in the global economy. IGI Global, 2020: 452–462.
13. Karaalp-Orhana H. S. Structural Transformation of the Turkish Economy under the scope of sustainable development. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2019; 8 (5): 161–161.
14. Smilka V. The role of monitoring in sustainable development. Baltic journal of real estate economics and construction management. 2019; 7 (1): 245–254.
15. Czvetko T., Honti G., Sebestyen V., Abonyi J. The intertwining of world news with Sustainable Development Goals: An effective monitoring tool. Heliyon. 2021; 7 (2): 1–21 (e06174).
16. Saner R., Yiu L., Nguyen. Monitoring the SDGs: digital and social technologies to ensure citizen participation, inclusiveness and transparency. Development policy review. 2020; 00: 1–18.
17. Nabukalu J. B., Asamani J. A., Nabyonga-Orem J. Monitoring Sustainable Development Goals 3: Assessing the Readiness of Low- and Middle-Income Countries. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2020; 9 (7): 297–308.
18. Ballerini L., Bergh S. I. Using citizen science data to monitor the Sustainable Development Goals: a bottom-up analysis. Sustainability Science. 2021; 16: 1945–1962.
19. Kittner C., Kletzan-Slamanig D., Köppl A., Littig B., Zielinska I. Monitoring Sustainable Development: Climate and Energy Policy Indicators. Journal of sustainability research. 2020; 2 (3): 1–42 (e200027).
20. Yount K. M., Bergenfeld I., Mhamud N., Clark C. J., Kaslow N.J, Cheong Y. F. Monitoring sustainable development goal 5.2: Cross-country cross-time invariance of measures for intimate partner violence. PLoS ONE. 2022; 17 (6): 1–19 (e0267373).
Review
For citations:
Stroev P.V., Dudnik A.I., Konishchev E.S. National Policy of Black Sea Region Countries Towards Sustainable Development. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2022;10(4):6-23. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2022-10-4-6-23