Preview

Review of Business and Economics Studies

Advanced search

An Empirical Analysis of the Russian Financial Markets’ Liquidity and Returns

Abstract

The study aims to identify whether illiquidity and returns in the Russian stock and bond markets may be forecasted with the help of local macroeconomic variables, internet queries, global factors as well as the fundamental asset classes’ characteristics. To address these questions we use the correlation analysis, the VAR analysis and Granger causality tests. Despite the structural instability of the Russian financial markets, the market microstructure variables influence each other and are affected by the characteristics of other asset types. In highly volatile markets dynamic models should be applied. Stock and bond returns may be used for forecasting liquidity and volatility in the Russian market. Stock illiquidity is not useful for forecasting returns in the Russian market as opposed to the US and UK markets. In the Russian market investors rely on risk factors rather than on illiquidity measures in decision-making process. Bond maturity in the Russian market has a significant impact on the bonds’ characteristics and implicitly on switching between different asset classes similarly to the US market. Increase in the number of internet queries may serve as an indicator of higher volatility and illiquidity in the Russian stock market in the future, but Google Trends should be used only in combination with other forecasting tools such as macroeconomic measures and political situation analysis.

About the Author

K. Lebedeva
Financial University
Russian Federation


References

1. Adrian, T. , & Shin, H. S. (2009). Money, liquidity and monetary policy. Staff Report, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, № 360.

2. Agnew, J., & Balduzzi, P. (2005). Rebalancing Activity in 401 (k) Plans. Working Paper, Boston College.

3. Akaike, H. (1969). Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21, 243-247.

4. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19 (6), 716-723.

5. Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17 (1986), 223-249.

6. Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1989). The Effect of Beta, Bid-Ask Spread, Residual Risk, and Size on Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 479-486.

7. Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H. & Lauterbach, B. (1997). Market microstructure and securities values: evidence from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Economics 45, 365-390.

8. Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time- series effects. Journal of Financial Markets 5, 31-56.

9. Andersen, T. G. (1996). Return Volatility and Trading Volume - An Information Flow Interpretation of Stochastic Volatility. The Journal of Finance 51 (1), 169-204.

10. Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1952). Asymptotic theory of certain "goodness-of-fi t" criteria based on stochastic processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23, 193-212.

11. Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1954). A Test of Goodnessof-Fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49, 765-769.

12. Andrikoupolos, A., & Angelidis, T. (2008). Idiosyncratic risk, returns and liquidity in London Stock Exchange: a spillover approach. International Review of Financial Analysis 19 (3), 214-221.

13. Andrikoupolos, A., Angelidis, T., & Skintzi, V. (2012). Illiquidity, return and risk in G7 stock markets: interdependencies and spillovers. MPRA Paper 40003, University Library of Munich, Germany.

14. Arouri, M., Aouadi, A., Foulquier, P., & Teulon, F. (2013). Can Information Demand Predict Stock Market Liquidity? Google it! IPAG Business School. Working Paper 2013-024.


Review

For citations:


Lebedeva K. An Empirical Analysis of the Russian Financial Markets’ Liquidity and Returns. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2015;3(3):5-31. (In Russ.)



ISSN 2308-944X (Print)
ISSN 2311-0279 (Online)