Exploring the Association between Poverty, Livelihoods, Institutions, and Sustainable Community Development. A Conceptual Analysis

The aim of this paper is to assess the links or interfaces between poverty, livelihoods, institutions, and sustainable community development through a literature review. To realize this objective, the study used the Department for International Development’s (United Kingdom) Sustainable Livelihoods Approach as an overarching theoretical foundation. A descriptive method of data analysis using secondary data and a qualitative research approach were followed. The current state of the problem has been explored by means of a deductive approach. The results of the conceptual analysis show that the interactions between poverty, livelihoods, institutions, and community development are significant. The study also revealed that institutions are crucial for the formation of livelihood possibilities and strategies for the poor and marginalized groups, and they play a significant role in sustainable development. Existing empirical evidence demonstrates that livelihood outcomes may be positive or negative based on vulnerability contexts, the nature of livelihood, institutional frameworks, and livelihood strategies followed. The study concludes that institutional influence is pivotal since it directly or indirectly affects the access to livelihood, determines livelihood strategies and outcomes. Policymakers are therefore expected to consider and comprehend the relationship between these notions before formulating policies, plans or programs to alleviate poverty and promote sustainable development effectively.

1. Fahad S., Nguyen-Thi-Lan H., Nguyen-Manh D., Tran-Duc H., To-The N. Analyzing the status of multidimensional poverty of rural households by using sustainable livelihood framework: policy implications for economic growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023;30(6):16106–16019. DOI: 10.1007/s11356–022–23143–0

2. Sen A. K. Multidimensional poverty: Conceptual and measurement issues. Oxford Studies Quarterly. 1999;2(3):1–2.

3. Gebrekidan D. K., Bizuneh A. M., Cameron J. Determinants of multidimensional poverty among rural households in Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Rural and Community Development. 2021;16(1):133–151.

4. Scoones I. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The journal of Peasant Studies. 2009;36(1):171–196. DOI: 10.1080/03066150902820503

5. Krantz L. The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction. SIDA. Division for Policy and Socio- Economic Analysis. 2001;44:1–38.

6. Carloni A. S. Rapid guide for missions: Analysing local institutions and livelihoods. Guidelines. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome; 2005.

7. Alkire S. Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty. Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2013.

8. Wagle U. Multidimensional poverty measurement: Concepts and applications, vol. 4: New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 2008.

9. Ravallion M. The economics of poverty: History, measurement, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.

10. Shepherd A. An evolving framework for understanding and explaining chronic poverty. In Chronic Poverty: Concepts, Causes and Policy. 2013; May30:7–37. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

11. Alkire S., Santos M. E. Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. Oxford University, 2010. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1815243

12. Ashley C., Hussein K. Developing methodologies for livelihood impact assessment: Experience of the African Wildlife Foundation in East Africa. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2000. URL: http://www.fooville.net/ecoag/research/ashley_2000.pdf

13. Rakodi C. A livelihoods approach — conceptual issues and definitions. In Urban livelihoods: A people-centred approach to reducing poverty. 2002; Jan.1:3–22. USA, Earthscan Publications Ltd.

14. Malul M. Poverty and social policy: Perceptions versus reality. Poverty & Public Policy. 2019; Dec.11(4):291– 301. DOI: 10.1002/pop4.261

15. Chambers R., Conway G. Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. Institute of Development Studies (UK); 1992. URL: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/775

16. Wang W., Lan Y., Wang X. Impact of livelihood capital endowment on poverty alleviation of households under rural land consolidation. Land Use Policy. 2021;109:105608. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105608

17. Solesbury W. Sustainable livelihoods: A case study of the evolution of DFID policy. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2003 Jun.

18. Razmi M. J., Razmi S. M.J., Sadati S. S. The role of institutional conditions in the impact of economic growth on poverty. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research. 2021;14:78–85. DOI: 10.25103/ijbesar.142.07

19. Khatiwada S. P., Deng W., Paudel B., Khatiwada J. R., Zhang J., Su Y. Household livelihood strategies and implication for poverty reduction in rural areas of Central Nepal. Sustainability. 2017;9(4):612. DOI: 10.3390/su9040612

20. Ellis F. Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford university press; 2000.

21. North D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. The limits of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

22. Hasan R., Mitra D., Ulubasoglu M. Institutions and policies for growth and poverty reduction: The role of private sector development. Asian Development Review. 2007;24(01):69–116. DOI: 10.1142/S0116110507500059

23. Brocklesby MA, Fisher E. Community development in sustainable livelihoods approaches — an introduction. Community development journal. 2003;38(3):185–198. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/38.3.185

24. Adato M., Meinzen-Dick R., Hazell P., Haddad L. Integrating social and economic analyses to study impacts on livelihoods and poverty: Conceptual frameworks and research methods. In Agricultural research, livelihoods, and poverty: Studies of economic and social impacts in six countries. 2007:22–55. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

25. Schutte D. W. Community development and community participation: A conceptual revisit Entwicklungsethnologie. 2000;9(1):12–26. DOI: 10.13140/Rg.2.2.22723.81443

26. Cavaye J., Ross H. Community resilience and community development: What mutual opportunities arise from interactions between the two concepts? Community Development. 2019; Mar.15;50(2):181–200. DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2019.1572634

27. Serrat O. The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach, Knowledge Solution, Asian Development Bank. 2008. URL: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/27638/sustainable-livelihoods-approach.pdf