Utility of Sacrifices: Reorientation of the Utility Theory
https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2023-11-2-67-72
Abstract
Utility theory is a pivotal concept in economics that provides insights into how an individual is motivated to act under budget constraints. The main assumption of this theory and the entire field of economics is that a rational human being and an individual derive utility from the consumption of goods and services under given budget constraints.
The aim of this article is to explore these fundamental assumptions and introduce a new theoretical framework for deriving utility, which is termed the “utility of sacrifices”.
Various methods were employed in the study, including a review of existing literature, an analysis of prevailing theories, and observations in real-world scenarios.
The results show that, through observations, a “rational” human being derives utility from both consumption and voluntary sacrifices.
Therefore, in conclusion, it is proposed that the total utility of an individual is the sum of these two components. This theoretical framework provides a more comprehensive understanding of human decision-making and behavior in economics. It also provides novel insights for future research and applications in economics.
Supporting agencies: The author appreciates the Vippasana Center, Kathmandu, Nepal where he got this insight while performing a 10-day vippasana meditation.
About the Author
A. GC
Tribhuvan University
Nepal
Nepal
Arun GC — Master of Arts in Economics (Tribhuvan University, Nepal); Master’s Degree in food security and agriculture development (Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea). MPhil-PhD in Economics (student), Central Department of Economics
Kathmandu
References
1. Alvino L., Constantinides E., Franco M. Towards a better understanding of consumer behavior: marginal utility as a parameter in neuromarketing research. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 2018;10(1):90–106. DOI: 10.5539/ijms.v10n1p90
2. Read D. Utility theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2004.
3. Sinisi C. Public school choice: parents’ consumer behavior and utility maximization. University of Colorado. 1992.
4. Fishburn P. C. Utility theory. Management Science. 1968;14(5):335–378. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.14.5.335
5. Michael R. T., Becker G. S. On the new theory of consumer behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 1973;75(4):378–396. DOI: 10.2307/3439147
6. Burgess J. P. From preference to utility: A problem of descriptive set theory. Notre Dame. Journal of Formal Logic. 1985;26(2):106–114. DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1093870819
7. Sepúlveda W. S., Maza M. T., Uldemolins P., Cantos-Zambrano E.G., Ureta I. Linking dark chocolate product attributes, consumer preferences, and consumer utility: impact of quality labels, cocoa content, chocolate origin, and price. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing. 2022;34(5):518– 537. DOI: 10.1080/08974438.2021.1908924
8. Kapteyn A. Utility and economics. De Economist. 1985;133(1):1–20. DOI: 10.1007/BF01675959
9. Stigler G. J. The development of utility theory. International Journal of Political Economics. 1950;58(4):307–327. DOI: 10.1086/256962
10. Rogers A. E. The theory of utility. Science. 1886;8(193):347–8. DOI: 10.1126/science.ns-8.193.347-a
11. David J. The homo economicus conception of the individual: an ontological approach. In U. MaKi. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Economics. 2012;13:459–482.
12. Boumans M. Measurement in economics. In U. Maki. Handbook Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Economics.2012;13:395–423.
13. Browning E., Browning J. Microeconomic theory and applications. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers; 2003.
14. Evans D. J. The elasticity of marginal utility of consumption: estimates for 20 OECD countries. Fiscal Studies. 2005;26(2):197–224. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475–5890.2005.00010.x
15. Koutsoyiannis A. Modern microeconomics. 2nd ed. London: MACMILLAN PRESS LTD; 1979.
16. Lancaster K. J. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal Political Economics. 1966;74(2):132–157. DOI: 10.1086/259131
17. Zeckhauser R. Time as the ultimate source of utility. The Quarterly Journal Economics. 1973;87(4):668– 675. DOI: 10.2307/1882037
18. Tanrikulu C. Theory of consumption values in consumer behaviour research: a review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2021;45(6):1176–1197. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12687
19. Urbina D. A., Ruiz-Villaverde A. A critical review of homo economicus from five approaches. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2019;78(1):63–93. DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12258
20. Kalberg S. Max Weber’s types of rationality: cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology. 1980;85(5):1145–79. DOI: 10.1086/227128
21. Demeulenaere P. Are there many types of rationality? Papers Revista de Sociologia. 2014;99(4):515–528. DOI: 10.5565/rev/papers.2114
22. Dittmer T. Diminishing marginal utility in economics textbooks. The Journal of Economic Education. 2005;36(4):391–399.
Review
For citations:
GC A. Utility of Sacrifices: Reorientation of the Utility Theory. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2023;11(2):67-72. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2023-11-2-67-72
Email this article 