The Planning System: Market and Centralization
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-10-3-18-25
Abstract
The article aims to outline approaches to the study of a harmonized model of forecasting, strategic planning and expectations of business communities. In the Introduction, the idea of transformation of planning to the dominance of the network approach instead of the dominance of centralization is substantiated. Materials and methods. The key aspects of the expediency of applying the experience of centralized planning under state ownership, providing information resources and applying modern high-tech methods for collecting, processing and analytically presenting materials to improve the effectiveness of preventive decisions, introducing a backbone component of leading indicators into network planning are considered. Results and discussion. The article includes innovative proposals for using the technology of leading indicators and increasing the role of horizontal links in planning with their help. It is concluded that it is necessary to shift the semantic emphasis in discussions on the development of planning to the harmonization of planning, forecasting and development parameters expected by business communities.
About the Author
I. Yu. Varyash
Scientific and Research Financial Institute (NIFI) Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor Yu. Varyash — Doctor of Economics, Head of office of The Research Financial Institute of the Ministry of
Finance of the Russian Federation, Honorary Professor of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Maggor E. Sources of state discipline: lessons from Israel’s developmental state, 1948–1973. Socio-Economic Review. 2021Apr;19(2):553–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy029
2. Neyland D., Ehrenstein V., Milyaeva S. On the difficulties of addressing collective concerns through markets: from market devices to accountability devices. Economy and society. 2019Apr3;48(2):243–67. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1576432
3. Ossandón J., Ureta S. Problematizing markets: market failures and the government of collective concerns. Economy and Society. 2019Apr3;48(2):175–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1576433
4. Zenkin A.A. Methods and tasks of network planning. Study guide. Moscow: Publishing house Knorus; 2021. 206 p.
5. Yesyutin A.A., Karpova E.V. Retail trade networks: strategies, economics and management. Moscow: Publishing house: Knorus; 2007. 424 p.
6. Yakovleva K.V. Assessment of economic activity based on text analysis. A series of reports on economic research. The Bank of Russia. 2017;(25). 15 р.
7. Androsik Y.N. Business ecosystems as a form of cluster development. General issues of economics and management. Proceedings of BSTU. 2016;(7):38–43.
8. Moore, James F. The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Era of Business Ecosystems. New York-HarperBusiness; 1996.
9. Varjash I.Y. Research of the model of leading indicators of investment conditions. Banking. 2022;(2):13–21.
10. Varjash I.Y., Logvinov S.A., Ilyinsky A.I., Dontsova O. Macroplanning of economic development. Dynamic model of leading indicators. Monograph. Nikolaev; 2014. 160 p.
11. Varjash I. Yu., Burova T.F., Panasenko K.K. Research of models of leading indicators of financing conditions. Cronos. 2019;38(11). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-modeley-operezhayuschihindikatorov-usloviy-finansirovaniya
Review
For citations:
Varyash I.Yu. The Planning System: Market and Centralization. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2022;10(3):18-25. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2022-10-3-18-25
Email this article 