Preview

Review of Business and Economics Studies

Расширенный поиск

Изучение взаимосвязи между налоговыми поступлениями и экономическим ростом в Индонезии с помощью модели эндогенного роста

https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2025-13-2-129-140

Аннотация

Целью данного исследования является анализ причинно-следственной связи между налоговыми поступлениями и экономическим ростом в Индонезии с использованием экономической модели эндогенного роста. Для анализа причинно-следственной связи применялась многомерная модель с применением подхода векторной авторегрессии, а в качестве теста — метод Тода–Ямамото. Результаты исследования временных рядов с 1983 по 2021 г. показывают, что контрольные переменные —  капитал, труд, прямые иностранные инвестиции, государственные расходы, инфляция и обменные курсы —  отражают инновационные механизмы и технический прогресс или общую производительность факторов производства в модели эндогенного роста, которая отражает взаимосвязь между налоговыми поступлениями и экономическим ростом в Индонезии. Результаты теста причинно-следственной связи с использованием метода Тоды–Ямамото показывают, что налоговые поступления и экономический рост влияют друг на друга; налоговые поступления способствуют стимулированию экономического роста и в то же время более высокий экономический рост приводит к увеличению налоговых поступлений. Авторы пришли к выводу, что в дополнение к налоговым поступлениям, вызывающим или стимулирующим экономический рост посредством финансирования экономической деятельности, возросший экономический рост и активность также увеличат объем налоговых поступлений, как из налоговой базы, так и из номинальных налоговых поступлений, определяемых экономическим ростом.

Об авторах

Й. Йоссиномита
Университет Динамика Бангса (Dinamika Bangsa University)
Индонезия

Йоссиномита Йоссиномита —  PhD в области экономики, преподаватель факультета менеджмента и бизнес-наук

Джамби



Х. Харьяди
Университет Джамби
Индонезия

Харьяди Харьяди —  PhD в области экономики, профессор, преподаватель факультета экономики и бизнеса

 Джамби



С. Наингголан
Университет Джамби
Индонезия

 Саидин Наингголан —  PhD в области экономики, профессор, преподаватель сельскохозяйственного факультета 

Джамби

 



З. Зульфанетти
Университет Джамби
Индонезия

 Зульфанетти Зульфанетти —  PhD в области экономики, преподаватель факультета экономики и бизнеса

Джамби



Список литературы

1. Keynes J. M. The general theory of employment, interest, and money. International Relations and Security Network. ISN-ETH Zurich; 1936. DOI: 10.2307/2278703

2. Schiller B.R, Gebhardt K. Essentials of economics. 11th ed. The McGraw-Hill Series Economics; 2005.

3. Yossinomita Y. Tax policy in limiting the consumption of luxury goods. Review of Economics and Finance. 2022;20(1):165–171. DOI: 10.55365/1923.x2022.20.19

4. Yossinomita Y., Haryadi, Hodijah S. Determining the future direction and amount of tax revenue in Indonesia using an error correction model (ECM). Ekonomika. 2024;103(1):56–77. DOI: 10.15388/Ekon.2024.103.1.4

5. Haryadi H., Umiyati E., Dhora S. T. Competitiveness and export development strategy for Indonesia’s creative economy sector in the ASEAN market. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah. 2021;9(2):127–138. DOI: 10.22437/ppd.v9i2.11832

6. Stiglitz J. E. Some lessons from the East Asian miracle. World Bank Research Observer. 1996;11(2):151–177. DOI: 10.1093/wbro/11.2.151

7. Syadullah M., Wibowo T. Governance and tax revenue in ASEAN countries. Journal of Social and Development Sciences. 2015;6(2):76–88. DOI: 10.22610/jsds.v6i2.845

8. Alesina A., Perotti R. Fiscal adjustments in OECD countries: composition and macroeconomic effects. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. 1996;(5730; August).

9. Blanchard O., Perotti R. An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. 1999;(7269; July).

10. Easterly W., Rebelo S. Fiscal policy and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. 1993;32(3):417–458. DOI: 10.1016/0304–3932(93)90025-B

11. Adhikari D. R., Rao S., Boudreaux D. Can US fiscal stimulus negatively affect US balance of trade? Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 2021;23(4):224–232.

12. Chen H., Singh B., Aru W. S. Relationship between government expenditure and economic growth: evidence from Vanuatu. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 2022;27(4):640–659. DOI: 10.1080/13547860.2020.1844610

13. Guo Y. M., Shi Y. R. Impact of the VAT reduction policy on local fiscal pressure in China in light of the COVID-19 pandemic: A measurement based on a computable general equilibrium model. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2021;69:253–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.010

14. Kim S., Park S. The effectiveness of capital expenditure in an endogenous growth model: evidence from US states. International Journal of Economics and Business Research. 2020;19(4):391–417. DOI: 10.1504/IJEBR.2020.107493

15. Maganya M. H. Tax revenue and economic growth in developing country: an autoregressive distribution lags approach. Central European Economic Journal. 2020;7(54):205–217. DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2020–0018

16. Mtui J. M., Ndanshau M. O.A. Fiscal expansion, adjustment and economic growth in Tanzania: 1967–2016. Business Management Review. 2020;23(2):106–125. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3637258

17. Peacock A. T., Wiseman J. The growth of public expenditure in the United Kingdom. In: National Bureau of Economic Research (General Series No. 72). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1961.

18. Yossinomita Y., Effiyaldi E., Feranika A., Mardiana R., Hassandi I., Pangestu M. G., Fahdillah Y. Analysis of optimal tax ratio and efficiency of regional tax revenue: a case study of provinces in Indonesia. Journal of Tax Reform. 2025;11(1):74–99. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2025.11.1.193

19. Due J. F. Government finance: economics of the public sector. 1st ed. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin; 1968.

20. Lin S. A.Y. Government spending and economic growth. Applied Economics. 1994;26(1):83–94. DOI: 10.1080/00036849400000064

21. Gurdal T., Aydin M., Inal V. The relationship between tax revenue, government expenditure, and economic growth in G7 countries: new evidence from time and frequency domain approaches. Economic Change and Restructuring. 2021;54(2):305–337. DOI: 10.1007/s10644–020–09280-x

22. Ho T. T., Tran X. H., Nguyen Q. K. Tax revenue-economic growth relationship and the role of trade openness in developing countries. Cogent Business and Management. 2023;10(2):1–14. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2213959

23. Neog Y., Gaur A. K. Macro-economic determinants of tax revenue in India: an application of dynamic simultaneous

24. equation model. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies. 2020a;13(1):13–35. DOI: 10.1504/IJE-PEE.2020.106682

25. Neog Y., Gaur A. K. Tax structure and economic growth: a study of selected Indian states. Journal of Economic Structures. 2020b;9(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1186/s40008–020–00215–3

26. Phuong L. N., Phuong N. N.T., Thu H. D.T. Determinants of tax revenue: a comparison between ASEAN-7 plus China and 8-European countries. International Journal of Business and Society. 2022;23(1):244–259. DOI: 10.33736/ijbs.4611.2022

27. Özker A. N. Tax wedge phenomenon and its possible analytical impacts on the investments in OECD. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance. 2020;8(2):41–53. DOI: 10.13189/ujaf.2020.080202

28. Sihaloho E. D. Analisis pengaruh penerimaan pajak terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia: pendekatan vektor autoregressive. Forum Ekonomi. 2020;22(2):202–209. DOI: 10.29264/jfor.v22i2.7370

29. Ormaechea S. A., Sola S., Yoo J. Tax composition and growth: A broad cross-country perspective. German Economic Review. 2019;20(4):1–37. DOI: 10.1111/geer.12156

30. Solow R. M. A Contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1956;70(1):65–94. DOI: 10.2307/1884513

31. Swan T. W. Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record. 1956;32(2):334–361. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1957.tb01279.x

32. Romer P. M. Human capital and growth: theory and evidence. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. 1990;32:251–286. DOI: 10.1016/0167–2231(90)90029-K

33. Bing X., García J. S., Gao Y., Chen X. Driving total factor productivity: capital and labor with tax allocation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020;150(C):1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119782

34. Bournakis I., Mallick S. TFP estimation at firm level: The fiscal aspect of productivity convergence in the UK. Economic Modelling. 2018;70:579–590. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.11.021

35. Miyashita D. Public debt and income inequality in an endogenous growth model with elastic labor supply. International Journal of Economic Policy Studies. 2023;17(2):30–55. DOI: 10.1007/s42495–023–00106-y

36. Renström T. I., Spataro L. Optimal taxation in an endogenous growth model with variable population and public expenditure. Journal of Public Economic Theory. 2021;23(4):639–659. DOI: 10.1111/jpet.12515

37. Takumah W., Iyke B. N. The links between economic growth and tax revenue in Ghana: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Sustainable Economy. 2017;9(1):34–55. DOI: 10.1504/IJSE.2017.080856

38. Guo Y. M., Shi Y. R. Impact of the VAT reduction policy on local fiscal pressure in China in light of the COVID-19 pandemic: A measurement based on a computable general equilibrium model. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2021;69:253–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.010

39. Liu T., Liu Z. A growth model with endogenous technological revolutions and cycles. Journal of Mathematical Economics. 2022;103:1–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102774

40. Wu T., Zhang N., Gui L., Wu W. Sustainable endogenous growth model of multiple regions: Reconciling OR and economic perspectives. European Journal of Operational Research. 2018;269(1):218–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.040

41. Enders W. Applied Econometric Time Series. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.

42. Toda H. Y., Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics. 1995;66(1–2):225–250. DOI: 10.1016/0304–4076(94)01616–8

43. Todaro M. P., Smith S. C. Economic Development. 12th ed. Pearson; 2015.

44. Fosu O. A.E., Magnus F. J. Bounds testing approach to cointegration: an examination of foreign direct investment trade and growth relationships. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2006;3(11):2079–2085. DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2006.2079.2085

45. Ghazo A. M., Qasrawi Q. M., Abu-Lila Z. M. An econometric analysis of tax evasion and its consequences on economic performance. Emerging Science Journal. 2021;5(2):211–220. DOI: 10.28991/esj-2021–01271

46. Yamada H. A note on the causality between export and productivity: an empirical re-examination. Economics Letters. 1998;61(1):111–114. DOI: 10.1016/s0165–1765(98)00154–2

47. Jaber Y., Kabouri I., Bouzahzah M., Ibourk A., Karim M. Economic growth and education in Morocco: cointegration and Toda Yamamoto Granger Causality. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics. 2022;3(4–1):1–20. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6611974

48. Pata U. K., Kartal M. T., Erdogan S., Sarkodie S. A. The role of renewable and nuclear energy R&D expenditures and income on environmental quality in Germany: Scrutinizing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with smooth structural changes. Applied Energy. 2023;342(April):121138. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121138

49. Ray S. Unraveling labour productivity growth and economic growth nexus in India: a Toda-Yamamoto dynamic Granger causality approach. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business. 2022;8(4):62–71. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20220804.11

50. Sankaran A., Kumar S., Das M. Estimating the causal relationship between electricity consumption and industrial output: ARDL bounds and Toda-Yamamoto approaches for ten late industrialized countries. Heliyon. 2019;5(6): e01904. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01904

51. Arvin M. B., Pradhan R. P., Nair M. S. Are there links between institutional quality, government expenditure, tax revenue and economic growth? Evidence from low-income and lower middle-income countries. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2021;70:468–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2021.03.011

52. Bhattacharyya C., Gupta M. R. Unionised labour market, environment and endogenous growth. International Review of Economics and Finance. 2021;72:29–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.10.005

53. Curtis E. M., Garrett D., Ohrn E., Roberts K., Serrato J. C.S. Capital investment and labor demand. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. 2022;(29485). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3963713

54. Fu Z., Le Riche A. Progressive consumption tax and monetary policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economics/Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie. 2021;133(3):271–93. DOI: 10.1007/s00712–021–00732–0

55. Todtenhaupt M., Voget J. International taxation and productivity effects of M&As. Journal of International Economics. 2021;131(C):1–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103438

56. Vatavu S., Lobont O. R., Stefea P., Brindescu-Olariu D. How taxes relate to potential welfare gain and appreciable economic growth. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2019;11(15):1–16. DOI: 10.3390/su11154094

57. Cornevin A., Corrales J. S., Mojica J. P.A. Do tax revenues track economic growth? comparing panel data estimators. Economic Modelling. 2024;140(November):106867. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106867

58. Otieno B. A. Public debt, investment and economic growth dynamics: do geographical proximity and spatial spillover effects matter? Regional Science Policy and Practice. 2024;16(6):100059. DOI: 10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100059

59. Sumandeep, Kiran R., Sharma R. K. Investigating the relationship of government revenue and expenditure on economic growth using a generalized method of moments: does state-level panel ensure sustainable growth? PLoS ONE. 2024;19(5): e0301764. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301764

60. Romer C. D., Romer D. H. The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review. 2010;100(3):763–801. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.763

61. Howitt P. Competition, innovation and growth. Innovation and Growth. 2009;246:15–24. DOI: 10.1787/9789264073975–4-en

62. Myles G. D. Taxation and economic growth. Fiscal Studies. 2000;21(1):141–68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475–5890.2000.tb00583.x


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Йоссиномита Й., Харьяди Х., Наингголан С., Зульфанетти З. Изучение взаимосвязи между налоговыми поступлениями и экономическим ростом в Индонезии с помощью модели эндогенного роста. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2025;13(2):129-140. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2025-13-2-129-140

For citation:


Yossinomita Y., Haryadi H., Nainggolan S., Zulfanetti Z. Examining the Relationship Between Tax Revenue and Economic Growth in Indonesia Through the Endogenous Growth Model. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2025;13(2):129-140. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2025-13-2-129-140



Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.


ISSN 2308-944X (Print)
ISSN 2311-0279 (Online)