Preview

Review of Business and Economics Studies

Advanced search

Time-Varying Co-Movements Between Green Bonds, CO₂ Emissions, the Investor Sentiment, and Financial Stress

https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2025-13-2-98-113

Abstract

Green bonds are attracting growing interest as sustainable financial instruments that support the transition to a low-carbon economy by financing environmentally responsible projects. Understanding how these instruments interact with CO₂ emissions and investor sentiment is essential to assess their stability and long-term potential. The aim of this study is to explore the dynamic relationships between green bonds and a selection of financial and environmental variables, including US conventional bonds, the WilderHill Clean Energy equity index, and CO₂ emission allowances. Additionally, the study evaluates the impact of investor sentiment and financial stress on green bond performance. The methods used include a quantile regression model, which assesses whether the Standard and Poor’s (S&P) Green Bond Index can be explained by the aforementioned variables — namely CO₂ emissions, clean energy stocks, investor sentiment (proxied by Google Trends), and financial stress [measured by the Office of Financial Research (OFR) Index]. The analysis covers the period from July 6, 2011, to September 15, 2023. To account for time-varying relationships, a Bayesian time-varying vector autoregressive (BTC–VAR) model is also applied. The results show a negative unidirectional effect from CO₂ emissions to the green bond index and a positive unidirectional effect from the clean energy index. However, green bonds appear weakly correlated with the other considered assets. Investor sentiment does not show a significant influence, while financial stress plays a more important role, indicating that green bonds may be perceived as safer assets during periods of uncertainty. The key conclusion is that green bonds exhibit selective sensitivity to specific financial and environmental factors. Their relative stability during episodes of financial stress reinforces their position as both sustainable and resilient investment tools. These findings provide useful insights for investors, policymakers, and researchers interested in the evolving dynamics of green finance.

About the Author

S. Boutouria
Probability and Statistics Laboratory; University of Sfax: Higher Institute of Business Administration
Tunisia

Souha Boutouria —  PhD in finance, Associate Professor

Sfax



References

1. Willis R., Curato N., Smith G. Deliberative democracy and the climate crisis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2022;13(2): e759. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.759

2. Wamsler C., Bristow J. At the intersection of mind and climate change: integrating inner dimensions of climate change into policymaking and practice. Climatic Change. 2022;173(1–2):7. DOI: 10.1007/s10584–022-03398–9

3. Wang Y., Zhi Q. The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of market mechanism and policies. Energy Procedia. 2016;104:311–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.053

4. Li W., Jia Z. Carbon tax, emission trading, or the mixed policy: Which is the most effective strategy for climate change mitigation in China? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2017;22(6):973–992. DOI: 10.1007/s11027–016–9710–3

5. Jones A. W. Perceived barriers and policy solutions in clean energy infrastructure investment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;104:297–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.079

6. Hyun S., Park D., Tian S. Differences Between Green Bonds Versus Conventional Bonds: A Comparative Study. In: Sachs J. D. (ed.) Handbook of Green Finance: Energy Security and Sustainable Development. Singapore: Springer; 2019:127–154. DOI: 10.1007/978–981–13–0227–5_34

7. Flammer C. Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021;142(2):499–516. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010

8. Tang D. Y., Zhang Y. Do shareholders benefit from green bonds? Journal of Corporate Finance. 2021;66:101786. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101786

9. Wang Y., Zhang J., Zhang D. Green bond development, climate policy, and carbon emissions: International evidence. Energy Economics. 2023;118:106506. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106506

10. Mezghani T., Ben Hamadou F., Boujelbène M., Boutouria S. Do green bonds affect extreme spillover and hedging effects across stocks and commodities? International Journal of the Economics of Business. 2024;31(2):103–130. DOI: 10.1080/13571516.2024.2336648

11. Yao T., Zhang Y. J., Ma C. Q. How does investor attention affect international crude oil prices? Applied Energy. 2017;205:336–344. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.131

12. Bai J., Chen Z., Yan X., Zhang Y. Research on the impact of green finance on carbon emissions: Evidence from China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2022;35(1):6965–6984. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2054455

13. Wang X., Wang S. The impact of green finance on inclusive economic growth — Empirical analysis based on spatial panel. Open Journal of Business and Management. 2020;8(5):2097–2111. DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2020.85128

14. Baulkaran V. Stock market reaction to green bond issuance. Journal of Asset Management. 2019;20(5):331–340. DOI: 10.1057/s41260–018–00105–1

15. Pham L., Huynh T. L.D. How does investor attention influence the green bond market? Finance Research Letters. 2020;35:101533. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101533

16. Zhou X., Cui Y. Green Bonds, Corporate Performance, and Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability. 2019;11(23):6881. DOI: 10.3390/su11236881

17. Zerbib O. D. The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2018;98:39–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012

18. Jin J., Han L., Wu L., Zeng H. The hedging effect of green bonds on carbon market risk. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2020;71:101509. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101509

19. Voica M. C., Panait M., Rădulescu I. G. Green investments — Between necessity, fiscal constraints and profit. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;22:72–79. DOI: 10.1016/S2212–5671(15)00228–2

20. Elsayed A. H., Naifar N., Nasreen S., Tiwari A. K. Dependence structure and dynamic connectedness between green bonds and financial markets: Fresh insights from time-frequency analysis before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Energy Economics. 2022;107:105842. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105842

21. Ahmed S., Mortaza M. G. Inflation and economic growth in Bangladesh: 1981–2005. Policy Analysis Unit, Working Paper Series. 2005; WP 0604. URL: https://www.bb.org.bd/pub/research/workingpaper/wp0604.pdf

22. Hansen B. E. Inference in TAR models. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics. 1997;2(1):16. DOI: 10.2202/1558–3708.1024

23. Chowdhury A., Ham R. Inflation targeting in Indonesia: Searching for a threshold. The Singapore Economic Review. 2009;54(4):645–655. DOI: 10.1142/S021759080900346X

24. Tsagkanos A., Argyropoulou D., Androulakis G. Asymmetric economic effects via the dependence structure of green bonds and financial stress index. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries. 2022;26: e00264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00264


Review

For citations:


Boutouria S. Time-Varying Co-Movements Between Green Bonds, CO₂ Emissions, the Investor Sentiment, and Financial Stress. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2025;13(2):98-114. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2025-13-2-98-113



ISSN 2308-944X (Print)
ISSN 2311-0279 (Online)