Linguoculturology and the Linguistic Picture of the World through the Neuropsychological Prism
https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2023-11-1-58-66
Abstract
The authors consider linguoculturology through the science of neuropsychology. They define and clarify the concepts necessary for the review of linguoculturology and the linguistic picture of the world through neuroscience, which can reveal the impact of culture and language on human consciousness. The problem is that the research on unconscious processes is not sufficiently widely disclosed and remains little studied. The goal is to identify the relationship between language and cultural concepts that most effectively affect the human subconscious. The tasks are to determine the relationship between culture and language through the neuropsychological prism of response triggers; to consider the manifestation of culture, which is reflected in the language, in unconscious - psychic suggestion; to establish the interdependence of national-specific features of the genesis of the linguistic worldview through ambivalent concepts. The relevance lies in the growing attention of the international community on the correlation of truth and “fake”, acceptance and rejection, as well as a broad interest in the field of neuropsychology. The methodology of this work is a descriptive review of EEG (electroencephalogram), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), and sound recording devices. The main conclusions. Human triggers (triggers) are inseparable from culture, language, and communication methods that lead to a narrowed perception of one’s own response. The manifestation of culture is reflected in the language, influences the people’s perceptions and their beliefs, where suggestion affects human consciousness.
About the Authors
L. M. SharafievaRussian Federation
Leysan Maratovna Sharafieva - teacher of mathematical and natural sciences; 3rd year postgraduate student
Naberezhnye Chelny
G. G. Tretyakova
Russian Federation
Galina Victorovna Tretyakova - Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of International Economic Relations
Moscow
References
1. Belozerova A. V., Loktionova N. M. Linguoculturology as a linguistic discipline. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2013;(1):355. URL: https://s.science-education.ru/pdf/2013/1/20.pdf (accessed on 02.02.2023).
2. Krysin L. P. On the correlation of the language system, its norms and usage. Communication Studies. 2017;2(12):20-31. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-sootnosheniyu-sistemy-yazyka-ego-normy-i-uzusa (accessed on 02.02.2023).
3. Alefirenko N. F. Linguoculturology: value-semantic space of language. Textbook. Moscow: Stipend; 2014. 288 p. (In Russ.).
4. Shurygina E. M. The concept of a picture of the world in linguoculturological illumination. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin 2014;3(1):184-187. (In Russ.).
5. Chomskaya E. D. Neuropsychology. Moscow: Knorus; 2005. 496 p. (In Russ.).
6. Vorobyev V. V. Linguoculturology. Theory and methods. (In Russ.). Moscow: Knorus; 1997. 331 p. (In Russ.).
7. Breuning L. G. Hormones of happiness. How to train the brain to produce serotonin, dopamine, endorphin and oxytocin? Moscow: Knorus; 2016. 94 p.
8. Maltseva A. A. Linguistic and cultural aspect in the methodology of teaching foreign languages. Bulletin of the Magistracy. 2019;(96):33-35 (In Russ.).
9. Konyratbayeva Zh., Sagadiyeva Z. Intercultural communication and language. Astana: Ğılım; 2020. 95 p.
10. Saibekova N. Grammatical paradigm: A. Baitursynuly and the formation of the Kazakh writing model. Almaty: Al Farabi Kazakh National University; 2020. 187 p.
11. Tagirova T.A culture-specific “linguistic picture of the world” in the organization of scientific discourse in a foreign language. In: Solovev, D., eds. Smart Technologies and Innovations in Design for Control of Technological Processes and Objects: Economy and Production. FarEastСon 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 139. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18553-4_3
12. Abidin Z. Analisis Peribahasa Indonesia yang Disediakan KBBI Daring (Analysis of Indonesian Proverbs Provided by KBBI Online). Jalabahasa. 2019;15(2):147-162. https://doi.org/10.36567/jalabahasa.v15i2.369 (accessed on 02.02.2023).
13. Bustan F., Semiun A., Bire J. Conceptualization of manggarai society on power relationship in marriage kinship. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana. 2020;25(6):433-441. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3987655 (accessed on 02.02.2023).
14. Ovchinnikova I. G. On connectionist interpretation of speech activity. Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2006;(4):37-47. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-konnektsionistskoy-intepretatsii-rechevoy-deyatelnosti (accessed on 02.02.2023).
15. Shchukin A. N. Linguodidactic encyclopedic dictionary: more than 2000 units. Moscow: Knorus; 2008. 746 p. (In Russ.).
16. Derzhavina G. R. Cognitive studies of language. Moscow: Knorus; 2008. 1144 p. (In Russ.).
17. Zubritskiy O. A. The role of linguoculturology in modern linguistics. Roman-German philology and intercultural communication. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. 2018;2:10-14. URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_39185042_73212258.pdf (In Russ.).
18. Saibekova N. Grammatical paradigm: A. Baitursynuly and the formation of the Kazakh writing model. Almaty: AlFarabi Kazakh National University; 2020. 124 p.
Review
For citations:
Sharafieva L.M., Tretyakova G.G. Linguoculturology and the Linguistic Picture of the World through the Neuropsychological Prism. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2023;11(1):58-66. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2023-11-1-58-66