Типология и характеристики глобальных когнитивных, духовных и нравственных сдвигов в мировой экономической системе

Предметом данного исследования является комплексная типология глобальных когнитивных, духовных и моральных сдвигов, в настоящее время влияющих на мировую экономическую систему. Цель исследования состоит в выявлении и классификации преобладающих трансформаций в индивидуальном и коллективном сознании, в системе моральных принципов, отражающихся в экономическом поведении и условиях роста на глобальном уровне. Актуальность данного исследования обусловлена необходимостью полноценного включения рассматриваемых факторов в концепцию экономического развития. Автор использует методы контент-анализа, индуктивного исследования процессов, охватывающих такие области, как знания, информация, ответственность и культура, и метод типологизации. Результат проведенного анализа состоит в прояснении механизмов проявления изучаемых сдвигов и их взаимодействия в рамках глобальной экономической системы. Новизна подхода заключается в выявлении сложных свойств и взаимосвязей между когнитивными и моральными трансформациями и их основополагающими факторами, а также их влиянием на экономическое развитие. Исследование показывает, что каждый тип изменений обладает прогрессивными характеристиками, однако процессы их протекания неравномерны в разрезе стран и сообществ и могут сталкиваться с проблемами двойственного понимания, что усложняет анализ обратных связей и их влияния на глобальную экономическую динамику. С концептуальной точки зрения данное исследование важно для развития теорий экономического роста, устойчивого развития и этической экономики. Авторы делают вывод, что предложенная типология может быть применена при разработке принципов политики, направленных на более эффективное использование преимуществ информационной и интеллектуальной революции, укрепление взаимного уважения между заинтересованными сторонами и содействие устойчивому экономическому развитию.

1. Kirdina-Chendler S.G., Maevsky V. I. Methodological Issues of the Meso-level Analysis in Economics. Journal of institutional studies. 2017;9(3):7–23. DOI: 10.17835/2076–6297.2017.9.3.007–023

2. Beinhocker E. D. The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics. Harvard Business Press; 2006. 527 p.

3. Jones C. I. Paul Romer: Ideas, Nonrivalry, and Endogenous Growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 2019;121(3):859–883. DOI: 10.1111/sjoe.12370

4. Grossman G. M., Helpman E. Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review. 1991;35(2– 3):517–526. DOI: 10.1016/0014–2921(91)90153-A

5. Aghion P., Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica. 1992;60(2):323–318. DOI: 10.2307/2951599

6. Hausman N. University innovation and local economic growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2022;104(4):718–735. DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_01027

7. Moyo C., Phiri A. Knowledge creation and economic growth: the importance of basic research. Cogent Social Sciences. 2024;10(1):2309714. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2024.2309714

8. Warsh D. Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations: A Story of Economic Discovery. New York: W. W. Norton; 2006. 426 p. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41795464 (accessed on 15.04.2025).

9. Models for assessing the impact of the knowledge economy on economic growth and innovation in regions. / Suslov V. I., ed. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of the Institute of Economics, Economics, and Policy Problems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2021. 256 p. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.iep.ru/files/text/other/Kaneva_Untura_Modeli_ocenki.pdf (accessed on 16.04.2025).

10. Pennington D. A conceptual model for knowledge integration in interdisciplinary teams: orchestrating individual learning and group processes. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. 2016;6:300–312. DOI: 10.1007/s13412–015–0354–5

11. Chintha B. R., Jagannathan R., Sridharan S. Globalization and Profitability of US Firms: The Role of Intangibles. NBER Working Paper No 3202, Social Science Research Network (SSRN). 2024;(w32202):1–56. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4746812 (accessed on 28.08.2025).

12. Budzinski O., Gaenssle S., Lindsta¨dt-Dreusicke N. The battle of YouTube, TV and Netflix: an empirical analysis of competition in audiovisual media markets. SN Business and Economics. 2021;1:116. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546–021–00122–0

13. Black S. Who Owns Your Data? Indiana Law Review. 2021;54(2):305–339. DOI: 10.18060/26022

14. Zheng C., Li Y., Dou R. Who should own the data? The impact of data value creation on data ownership. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 2024;190:110093. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2024.110093

15. Scoones I., Leach M., Newell P., eds. The politics of green transformations. New York: Routledge; 2015. URL: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/37acb7c4–443f-4ea7–886b-e2c080d8a1d1/9781317601128.pdf (accessed on 25.05.2025).

16. Clark W. C., Harley A. G. Sustainability Science: Toward a Synthesis. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2020;45:331–86. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-012420–043621

17. Stirling A. Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research and Social Science. 2014;1:83–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001

18. Siemroth C., Hornuf L. Why Do Retail Investors Pick Green Investments? A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment with Crowdfunders. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2023;209:74–90. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.02.023

19. Sangiorgi I., Schopohl L. Why do institutional investors buy green bonds: Evidence from a survey of European asset managers. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2021;75:101738. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101738

20. Shabanova M. A. Ethical consumption: Theoretical concepts and a contribution to the debate. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2024;7:53–80. (In Russ.) URL: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736–2024–7–53–80

21. Kuhn T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962. 210 p.

22. Newman J. Promoting Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration: A Systematic Review, a Critical Literature Review, and a Pathway Forward. Social Epistemology. 2024;38(2):1–17. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2172694

23. Kapeliushnikov R. I. Artificial intelligence and the problem of siguilarity in economics. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025;5:5–45. (In Russ.) URL: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736–2025–5–5–45

24. Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books; 2002. 404 p.

25. Nevzorova T. A., Kutcherov V. G. The concept of technological innovation system: The basic principles and opportunities. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022;5:99–120. (In Russ.) URL: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736–2022–5–99–120

26. Pagano U. The Crisis of Intellectual Monopoly Capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2014;38:1409– 1431. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2537972 (accessed on 01.05.2025).

27. Cukier K., Mayer-Schoenberger V. The Rise of Big Data: How It’s Changing the Way We Think About the World. Foreign Affairs. 2013;92(3):28–40. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23526834 (accessed on 01.05.2025).

28. Kostakis P., Kargas A. Big-Data Management: A Driver for Digital Transformation? Information. 2021;12(10):411. DOI: 10.3390/info12100411

29. Chen H., Chiang R. H.L., Storey V. C. Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact. MIS Quarterly. 2012;36(4):1165–1188. DOI: 10.2307/41703503

30. Brady D. Theories of the Causes of Poverty. Annual Review of Sociology. 2019;45:155–175. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018–022550

31. Sotiropoulou T., Giakoumatos S. G., Petropoulos D. P. Financial development, financial stability and economic growth in European Union: A panel data approach. Advances in Management and Applied Economics. 2019;9(3):55–69.

32. Cerra V., Lama R., Loayza N. Links Between Growth, Inequality, and Poverty: A Survey. IMF Working Papers. 2021;2021(068). DOI: 10.5089/9781513572666.001

33. Tooze A. Crashed: How a Decade of Financial Crises Changed the World. New York: Viking; 2018. 720 p.

34. Kazakova M. V. The concept of human capital and the mechanisms of its influence on economic growth. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4126417

35. Auzan A. A. Individualism and Collectivism: Two Cultural Cores of Russia. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2024;67(4):11–26. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.30727/0235–1188–2024–67–4–11–26

36. Seiple C., Hoover D. R. A Case for Cross-Cultural Religious Literacy. The Review of Faith and International Affairs. 2021;19(1):1–13. DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2021.1874165

37. Kanaeva O. A. Corporate Social Responsibility: Formation of a Conceptual Framework. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2009:5(2):25–39. (In Russ.).

38. Giovanni-Battista D., Zoni L., Dossi A. Corporate Social Responsibility Performance, Incentives, and Learning Effects. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021;173(3):617–641. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/45396465 (accessed on 12.05.2025).

39. Chzhan C., Nedospasova O. P. Corporate Environmental Responsibility: Evolution and Development Trends. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Economics. 2023;64:134–150. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17223/19988648/64/10

40. Darga K. F., Gali V. B. Perception and Awareness of Consumers towards Green Products: Evidence from India. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2024;12(2):6–16. DOI: 10.26794/2308–944X-2024–12–2–6–16

41. Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. 384 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790881

42. Wilber K. A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science, and Spirituality. Boston: Shambhala Publications; 2000. 384 p.

43. Glaser M., Krause G., Ratter B. M.W., Welp M., eds. Human-nature interactions in the anthropocene. Potentials of social-ecological systems analysis. New York: Routledge; 2012. 256 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203123195

44. Omoyajowo K., Danjin M., Omoyajowo K., et al. Exploring the interplay of environmental conservation within spirituality and multicultural perspective: insights from a cross-sectional study. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2024;26:16957–16985. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668–023–03319–5

45. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press; 2001. 317 p.

46. Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. 597 p. DOI: 10.1002/9781444319514

47. Alkharafi N., Alsabah M. Globalization: an overview of its main characteristics and types, and an exploration of its impacts on individuals, firms, and nations. Economies. 2025;13(4):91. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13040091

48. Noelle A., Castells M. Networks of outrage and hope — social movements in the Internet age. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2013;25(3):398–402. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edt020

49. Estrada E. What is a Complex System, After All? Foundations of Science. 2024;29:1143–1170. DOI: 10.1007/s10699–023–09917-w

50. Potamianos N. Moral Economy: A Narrow and a Broad View. Critical Historical Studies. 2024;11(1). URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/729378

51. Eccles R. G., Ioannou I., Serafeim G. The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science. 2014;60(11):2835–2857. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24550546 (accessed on 14.05.2025)

52. Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review. 2011;89(1–2):62–77.

53. Thomas I., Hegarty K., Holdsworth S. The Education for Sustainability Jig-Saw Puzzle: Implementation in Universities. Creative Education. 2012;3:840–846. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2012.326125

54. Alekseev P. V. Assessment of the Modern Climate Policy of the European Union. Review of Business and Economics Studies. 2024;12(1):16–24. DOI: 10.26794/2308–944X-2024–12–1–16–24